Robert Barnes is a Los Angeles attorney. TGP has reported to Robert about the “Giant Slayer” over the years. As part of Alex Jones’ legal team, Robert Barnes has embraced the view that the Sandy Hook lawsuits brought against Jones are part of a conspiracy to cripple the First Amendment.
In a recent interview with David Freiheit (Viva Free), Barnes provides the best explanation of what’s really going on. This discussion starts at minute 1:35:00 of this video and lasts for 12 minutes. Below are key interview comments made by Attorney Barnes, some are flat-out shocking.
Barnes says the real grifters at Sandy Hook are Elizabeth Williamson of The New York Times and attorney Chris Mattei, who represents the families. Williamson has built a career out of Sandy Hook with nearly 40 articles this year. Pursuing this story for a decade put him on TV, radio, books, etc. Hundreds of articles have also been published by the NYT since the 2012 incident. The defamation lawsuit is being tried by Judge Barbara Bayliss in Connecticut Superior Court.
1:35:45 – Barnes explains: Alex Jones almost never denied that Sandy Hook happened. (On his show) He answered questions from two callers. It was not associated with any ads, at any time. Why isn’t Jones allowed to explain it (in court)? None of his financial success had anything to do with Sandy Hook.
popular: On January 6, the prisoner was beaten until he lost one of his eyes, later tied to a chair for 12 hours, now suffering from blood clots and pre-cancerous growths, the government allowed him medical treatment. Won’t Give Up – They Want Him Dead – Exclusive Audio
The main proof of this is two things. More than 99% of InfoWars publications and broadcasts actually said that Sandy Hook happened. Their Sandy Hook coverage was less than 1% of all coverage during the time frame. These are critical facts that tell you whether he made money or not. If you calculated it, it would be 1/1000th of 1%. The plaintiff has all his financial information, the dates he stated, and you can add that (as a profit). So why didn’t they?
1:36:54 – Because if you review this information, and I have, he didn’t make money. Sandy Hook was a net loser for Jones. They can’t show any connection that Jones made money from it. In fact, when you look at the details, it cost him money to challenge Sandy Hook, and it cost his supporters. Why are these facts not coming out? Because Judge Bayliss said Jones can’t Tell the jury how little he covered Sandy Hook. that can’t Tell the jury how he didn’t make money off Sandy Hook. that can’t Tell the jury how much it cost him, more than it helped him. that can’t Tell the jury how 99% of InfoWars coverage said Sandy Hook happened.
1:38:20 – They have to make up a lie to buy off a jury, to get a grand jury, for things that aren’t even related to compensatory damages. Plaintiffs are allowed to introduce all evidence that suggests he is rich and famous since Sandy Hook. But Jones is not allowed to state that he is in bankruptcy, did not make money from Sandy Hook, and hardly ever covered it up. Why is he not allowed (to say this to the jury) – because the truth leads to a lower verdict.
1:39:14 – This is a fake case, allegedly about fake news. You’ve got a corrupt judge and a rogue ambulance chasing plaintiff’s lawyer, with the help of liberals like Elizabeth Williamson of the New York Times, trying to lie to the world about the real person who died at Sandy Hook. Earned money. You know who the biggest money makers from Sandy Hook are? the media The media knows every time they glamorize a mass shooter, that it increases the likelihood of another mass shooting. And the media wants it to happen. Because they line their pockets with it. And in Democrat politicians Connecticut, tied to this corrupt court system and lawyers, also reaps political benefits from it. Because it’s their excuse to take away everyone’s guns.
There is an incentive for the media and democratic politicians. They are weaponizing the case, in part, to encourage another mass shooting to happen. They want it, because they get rich from it, and gain political power from it. It’s a reality they don’t want anyone to talk about, because Alex Jones was talking about it (at the time).
1:41:25 – Barnes explains why Judge Bayliss barred Jones from making important disclosures in court. “Mostly it’s for them to be able to lie to the jury, write a big check, when none of that is relevant to the trial. The fear is that if the jury hears about the Jones bankruptcy….they hear the conviction, They hear the suffering, they don’t see a very rich person being empowered by Sandy Hook. This completely negates the plaintiff’s narrative.
1:42:10 – If you look at that (court) investigation, the plaintiff’s attorney was trying to falsely imply that all of Jones’ money and success….that he’s currently very successful, and it’s all Sandy. comes from the hook. Both of these are lies that this corrupt court wants the jury to believe. The judge originally ordered that Alex Jones could not give meaningful answers, he could only answer with “yes”, “no” or “I don’t know”. If you want to see how not to be a lawyer, check out this political hack Chris Matty in court. It wasn’t just theater, it was bad theater, a bad show trial. Even civil law people who are opposed to Alex Jones are saying they can’t justify this judge’s behavior, can’t justify Chris Matty’s behavior.
1:44:56 – Barnes clarifies that Jones never visited the victims’ homes, never interviewed them, and only mentioned one name in passing. This is the exact opposite of what others have done, and continue to do. It’s too bad, Elizabeth Williamson of the New York Times likes to leave Sandy Hook. She likes to make money from these people’s pain. All they accused Alex Jones of is who these plaintiff lawyers are, who Williamson is. They love it when these parents are so miserable because all they can do is cha ching, cha ching, interview after interview, with big pharma ads in between. Just filling their pockets.
1:45:36 – This whole matter is revealed through the projection of the confession. What they accuse Alex Jones of is exactly what Elizabeth Williamson is guilty of. So the New York Times is to blame. So CNN is to blame. And Williamson goes out and makes a completely false statement. He said Jones was not called to the stand by his own attorney because of how terrible Jones was on the stand. It was a complete fabrication, an outright lie. Also, Jones has repeatedly apologized to the family, but he won’t apologize to the ambulance chasing the plaintiff’s attorney.
1:47:50 – What Jones says about the court outside the courtroom, I have never heard in my life, during a trial, in relation to that. It has nothing to do with compensatory damages. Jones called Judge Bayliss a “cruel.” While on the witness stand, Matty asked Jones if he characterized everyone he disliked as a villain. Jones replied “No, only those who act like savages”. Barnes explained the effects of corrupt practices such as Judge Bayliss and Lawyer Mattei. that iThere is still doubt in the justice system. This leads to an undermining of our faith in our own government’s justice system….and diminishes faith in outcomes.
Barnes on the Project Veritas case:
1:24:45 – Barnes also discusses the Project Veritas case at the 1:24:45 mark. Barnes explains: If you are a Democrat and your crimes are exposed, you can sue the other person for exposing your crimes, and the government will investigate the person who exposed the crimes, and put them in jail. will try This is the new American legal system under the Biden administration. He suggests that if we want to drain the swamp, the first stop is to close and dissolve the DC courts.