The nation erupted in tears of joy and despair on Friday when Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito’s verdict was overturned, overturning Rowe Wade’s 1972 decision on abortion.
In his opinion, Alito highlighted the many rights and freedoms explicitly granted to the American people. He also said that the court was returning power to the people to influence the future.
However, Friday’s news revealed a deeper issue in the United States. It highlighted the existence of pure ignorance and the absence of personal responsibility. Headlines, statements, social media posts, protests and broadcasts have highlighted the problem of infecting the nation faster than the recent Kovid-19 epidemic.
Democrats, celebrities, and the mainstream media have led the way because they continue to deny the ruling party, calling it a denial of the constitutional rights of the American people. Many claim that Alito’s rule diminishes such rights and freedoms.
Former Disney child star Selena Gomez escalated the story on Friday, posting on Twitter that she felt the rights were being taken away.
Popular: Must watch video: First day of abortion uprising – Democrat leaders lead calls for mass violence, violent mobs terrorize communities, behead
The loss of constitutional rights is horrendous. A woman should have the right to choose what she wants to do with her body. End of story.
– Selena Gomez (@ SelenaGomez) June 24, 2022
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi also shared this misinformation She says“American women today have less freedom than their mothers.”
If you read the judgment issued by the court, despite the claims of President Biden and others, those claims can be refuted and clarified as an act of empowering the American people.
“Rowe was at odds with the Constitution from the day it was decided, Casey maintained his mistakes, and those mistakes are not related to some strange corner of the law that is less important to the American people,” Alito said. . Instead, nothing but “crude judicial power”, … the court used its power to address a question of profound moral and social significance that the Constitution clearly leaves to the people.
It was his way of showing that the court was not an arbiter of access to life-changing decisions such as abortion, nor was it the body that set the authority to oversee such options. The court decided to return the right of the people to run such things within their state of residence governed by the influence of their vote.
“It’s time to look at the constitution and return the issue of abortion to the elected representatives of the people,” Alito said.
Elito further clarifies that while returning to the basis of the Constitution, if the court is to uphold the right to abortion, it forces a particular principle on the question, what is life?
“Our opinion is not based on any idea as to whether and when prenatal life is entitled to the rights acquired after birth. When do rights begin? According to disagreement, the Constitution requires states to recognize a fetus as lacking the most basic human right – to live – at least until an arbitrary point in pregnancy has passed. Nothing in India or in the legal traditions of our nation gives the court the right to adopt that ‘principle of life’, “Alito said.
He noted that neither the constitution nor any legal tradition allows the Supreme Court to adopt a “principle of life” that would constitute the right moment to declare the fetus a person. In short, courts do not want to work to handle an ethical situation that requires them to determine if a particular life has any value.
In his opinion, Alito explicitly stated that “the principle of life,” or the decision that when a person becomes entitled to life and rights, is not defined, nor is it upheld in the US Constitution. .
“Therefore, we believe that the constitution does not give the right to abortion. Roe and Casey should be repealed, and the right to regularize abortions should be returned to the people and their elected representatives.
Despite Alito’s clear and defined details, the government and the media continue to advance a narrative that states that abortion is a “constitutional right.”
On Friday, President Biden made the false claim while addressing the nation, spreading misinformation and provoking overwhelming emotional responses from Americans.
President Biden commented on the Supreme Court’s decision on the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization to reverse Rowe v. Wade. https://t.co/nUiI79bxrE
– President Biden (pots) June 24, 2022
Others claim that the order is nothing more than a gateway to abolishing access to contraception, same-sex marriage, and other rights. Although there is no guarantee that those rights will not be challenged in court, Alito addresses these concerns directly.
Robert Reach, a professor at Berkeley, went on to claim that the removal of other rights would directly follow the decision.
What rights will be taken away next?
Contraception. Same-sex marriage. Consensual homosexual sexual activity.
Clarence Thomas himself said: The Supreme Court is coming for your right to privacy. pic.twitter.com/PXeMr9d6dR
– Robert Reich (RBReich) June 24, 2022
Alito directly refutes this in his written opinion.
Alito writes, “Finally, disagreement suggests that our decision questions Griswold, Eisenstadt, Lawrence and Oberfell. But we have made it clear that”[n]Anything in this opinion should be considered to cast doubt on instances which are not related to abortion. We also explain why this is so: the rights to contraception and homosexuality are naturally different from the right to abortion because the latter (as we have emphasized) is uniquely included which Roe and Casey have. Called ‘potential life’.
He explains that the decision to overthrow Rowe Wade was based on the word life. Alito reiterates that the court is not prepared to accept a position as a god responsible for deciding the beginning of life.
Others claim that the court’s decision has removed power from women, reduced their value and rights over their bodies. California Congressman Eric Svelwell tried to signal that the ruling party set women’s rights 50 years ago!
– Rap. Eric Swalwell (epRepSwalwell) June 25, 2022
Congress Said Adam Schiff“The court’s decision to reverse Rowe threatens everywhere, depriving women of their right to choose their own health care.”
Nothing can happen beyond the truth.
“Our decision is to return the issue of abortion to those legislatures, and to allow women on both sides of the abortion issue to influence the legislative process by running for public opinion, lobbying for legislators, voting, and running for office,” Alito writes. “Women are not without electoral or political power. It is important to note that the percentage of women voting and registering to vote is consistently higher than the percentage of men doing so.”
Throughout Rowe’s opinion, Alito is clear that his intention, along with other judges, is to return power to the citizens of the United States. He is returning the constitutional right to vote, lobby and legislate at the state level.
The submission of this order and the public response have exposed the problem of most Americans. This problem is evident at every level, from the government to the media, celebrities and the general public. There is a general laziness that is prevalent among Americans. Very few people are willing to read the decrees or orders that affect this decision.
The lack of a moral foundation, and the loss of respect for others, has empowered them to take advantage of the people in Washington, on television, and in leadership. They can make headlines, publish ideas and start a national debate that is far from the truth and far from being anchored in the facts. Sadly, the American people have allowed them to exploit that weakness in order to stay in power.
This order is not a lack of rights and freedoms; It is the empowerment of the people and the return to the constitutional foundation on which this nation was built.